Introducing Comac, China’s answer to Boeing and Airbus

If you’re in charge of purchasing or leasing aircraft for a major airline, your options are pretty limited. You can go with America’s home team, the venerable and truly massive Boeing. Or you can go with Airbus, the French-based company whose planes account for around half of the world’s commercial fleet.

But as the world sits on the brink of a new and potentially massive surge in demand for airliners, particularly in the developing world, a new company has sprung into view, with naked ambitions to take business from the aerospace powers that be. Not only is it well funded and deep into the design stages of its first commercial airliner, which will debut in 2016–it’s already taking orders for hundreds of planes.

To top it all off, it’s based in a country long overdue for a commercial air travel revolution, in a region that Boeing itself has claimed will account for half of the world’s new air traffic in the next 20 years. Meet Comac, China’s soon-to-be aerospace powerhouse.

The company is expected to announce its first orders for commercial airliners at the Zhuhai Air Show, which, as reported by Bloomberg News, are expected to number in the hundreds.

What, exactly, are companies committing to with Comac? For a flagship product, it’s somewhat tame: The Comac C919 is a narrow body airliner, cast in the (rough) mold of popular domestic jets like the Airbus A320 and the Boeing 737. It will seat 160 passengers, most of whom aren’t likely to notice the difference between this plane and the last one they flew on.

To be clear, though, Comac isn’t aiming to out-innovate its competitors, at least for now. With the help of the Chinese government, its boosters hope to make a dent in the worldwide airliner market, and with any luck, own its growth in China, India, and the rest of the Asia Pacific area.

Single-aisle aircraft already account for a staggering 11,580, or 61%, of the world’s jet fleet, numbers that Boeing expects to rocket to 25,000 and 69% by 2029. For the C919’s construction, Comac has called on contractors domestic and foreign, including Honeywell, GE and Eaton Corporation. In fact, American contractors building parts for Comac currently outnumber Chinese contractors, especially when it comes to more complicated parts like engines and hydraulics systems. In due time, Comac plans to shift more of its manufacturing load to domestic companies.

In other words, in both strategy and plane design, Comac is acting with pure pragmatism. It’s aiming straight for a soft, expanding market with a plane that will share many parts–and in theory, most capabilities–with some of the most popular aircraft in the world, seeking differentiation by price, not technology. (Comac hasn’t publicly discussed pricing for the C919, but its expected to be low. The company’s first aircraft, a small regional jet, retailed for about $20m, while its closest Boeing counterpart, the 717-200, cost about $40m while it was still in production.)

The C919 won’t be carrying passengers until 2016, but lumbering companies like Boeing and Airbus, whose orders are delivered in years, not months, may start to feel the heat from their new competitor, very, very soon.

One thought on “Introducing Comac, China’s answer to Boeing and Airbus

  1. With its 153.5″ trim-to-trim cabin interior width, the C919 is in an entriely different ballpark vs A32X series or 73XNG series : whereas the two latter are (3+3) aircraft, C919 will be proposed in a Thompson-staggered twin aisle version : the staggering will do away with the seat separators, saving 2.5″ x 3 = 7.5″ and if use is made of type 737 seat cushions @ 17″ plus if using A320 standards for the aisles @ 19″, with the super-HQR cross-section (1+3+2) the dimensions will be as follows : 0.7″ + [2″+17″+2″] + 19″ + [2″ + 17″ + 17″ + 17″ + 2″] + 19″ + [2″ + 17″ + 17″ +2″] + 0.7″ = total 153.4″ which is OK… The properly HUGE [gigantic, outsized, monstruous] centrebin of the C919 will accomodate some 18 cuft per linear 32″, or 3 cuft/pax, to which we may add the capacity of a reduced size lateral stowage bin above the lhs double seat with room for yet another 4 cuft per linear 32″, total 3.7 cuft/pax. Enough room will be oofer in the cabin for 300 carry-on rollerbags, which C919 operators may charge 35 $/piece, equating in equivalent extra revenue to 35 additional passengers paying 300 $ for their tickets … it’s like having a seventh line of seats down the full length of the C919 cabin, so virtually, the C919 (1+3+2) makes money as if it were a (2+3+2) 7-abreast aircraft !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s